Court Keeps Arrest Warrants Active in Case Related to Islamabad Court Upholds Arrest Warrants
Islamabad court upholds arrest warrants issued against Sohail Afridi, the Chief Minister of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, in a cybercrime-related case involving alleged misleading statements against state institutions.
The District and Sessions Court of Islamabad maintained the arrest warrants after the accused failed to appear before the court despite previous orders. The hearing was conducted to review compliance with judicial directives.
The case was registered under the country’s cybercrime legislation and involves allegations that the chief minister made statements that were considered harmful to the credibility of government institutions.
Court Orders Authorities to Execute Arrest Warrant
The court hearing was presided over by Senior Civil Judge Abbas Shah. During the session, officials informed the court that efforts to arrest and present the accused had not been successful.
The judge ruled that the arrest warrants against Sohail Afridi would remain active. Authorities were directed to ensure the production of the accused at the next scheduled hearing.
The court emphasized that legal proceedings must follow judicial orders to prevent unnecessary delays in the case.
According to prosecution records, the investigation was initiated by the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency under relevant sections of the law.
Cybercrime Allegations and Legal Proceedings
The case against Sohail Afridi is linked to allegations of spreading information that allegedly misled the public and harmed state credibility.
Legal experts note that such cases are typically investigated under Pakistan’s electronic crime laws. Readers can learn more about cybercrime regulations at the official resource:
https://www.pakistan.gov.pk/
The prosecution argued that the accused’s statements were examined under applicable sections of the Prevention of Electronic Crimes framework.
Previous Warrants and Next Hearing Date
Multiple arrest warrants have already been issued for Sohail Afridi in this case.
After hearing brief arguments from prosecution representatives, the court adjourned further proceedings until March 9.
The legal process is expected to continue as authorities attempt to enforce the production orders issued by the court.
FAQs:
H3: Why did the court uphold the arrest warrants?
The court upheld the warrants because the accused was not produced despite earlier directions.
H3: What charges is Sohail Afridi facing?
He is facing allegations of making misleading statements against state institutions under cybercrime laws.
H3: When is the next hearing scheduled?
The court adjourned the case until March 9.
H3: Which agency is investigating the case?
The investigation is being conducted by the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency.
